When it rains, it pours. Manuscripts in need of editing, that is. Each in a different stage of editing: developmental, line and copy edits, oh my. It’s a three-layer parfait.
The work in progress novel must be ready for submission by the beginning of May. And it’s rough. It’s missing crucial elements. It needs developmental edits galore.
About the time I’m reaching the three-quarter point on that project, I get a manuscript I haven’t looked at since December back from an editor. I haven’t given it a thought since then. Back when I made the developmental changes to it.
Now, the second editor is making a few line edit suggestions that require actual rewriting. Mostly additions, to flesh out a few things added in during the developmental stage.
You know, things that will deepen the story, make the characters more believable and ultimately engage the reader.
And every author wants to ensnare the reader and make them forget they’re even reading. Lasso them into the story realm and hold them hostage until they reach the last page.
“I’ll finish the novel edits first,” I decide. “Then I’ll delve into this other story.”
Meanwhile, the short story I wrote in December and polished in January was sold in February. It’s slated for a June release.
So, of course, I got the first round of edits from the editor. Because I had nothing else on my plate.
Why did I think it was a good idea to have so many projects going at one time?
Oh right, because writers write. And when writers sell their writing, it means they must revisit that story world over and over.
Which is something I enjoy because my story gets better and more enchanting with each round of edits.
The publisher who purchased said short story has never made developmental editing suggestions. I’d like to think it’s because my stories are well-written, but I have a feeling it has more to do with budget and short publishing timelines.
The edits for the story were line edits. A few commas, questionable word choice, repetitions pointed out. All of it a quick fix.
So that should be a simple turnaround, right?
Uh, have you met me?
I will read through the entire story again and tighten every sentence I can. In fact, I deleted two sentences in the second scene, deciding they made my male protagonist look too eager.
So, I have a 14,000-word manuscript to line and copy edit. The second-round edits are mostly line edits, too, but involve some additions. That’s a 20,000-word manuscript.
And the ugly developmental edits on the revised first draft of the novel are getting into the heart and heat of the story. When everything blows up. When my characters enter the crucible and come out the other side as different people.
How do I prioritize this?
My gut says to finish the novel because it needs to get input from alpha readers and my editor. Then it may very well require extensive rewrites before it’s ready to enter the polishing phase.
After all, it’s not even on its way to a publisher yet. It needs to be honed to a shining jewel before I submit it, in hopes the publisher will love it. Will make an offer on it.
And then it will come back again. For developmental edits and then line edits and finally for minor copy tweaks.
Lucky me, though, I can enjoy all three stages of editing today. Right this very moment. With three separate projects.
3 thoughts on “The Three Stages of Editing – And why you shouldn’t try them all at once”
“It’s a three-layer parfait. Of doom.” Thanks for the laugh to start my morning off right!
I’d say prioritize the big edits, because they can’t be rushed. Line tweaks can be done in a surprisingly short time if desperation is wielding the whip.
That’s pretty much how it happened. I clicked through the line edits and fixed them rather quickly. All three of these projects are back with editors now. Hopefully, I won’t have three projects in editing stages again in the near future.
It wasn’t a fun experience, and I’m pretty sure none of the three are the “best” I could have made them if I could have focused all my attention on them one at a time.
Never rains but it pours, eh?